Beauty, Suffering, and Mortality

-

How about them who experience their daily being as burdensome and unbearable? Do they have their share in the beauty we are talking about? I claim that they do. To quote Marsilio Ficino, amor est desiderium pulchritudinis, love is the longing for beauty. Someone may have a life that seems devoid of both love and beauty, and I am afraid that there are plenty of such people. But life without longing, without hope or desire for something better, is unthinkable. Life that has no expectations, even if it were nothing more than getting drunk or waiting for the next meal, is inevitably going to its end. Hence beauty is present even in the struggle for survival, amidst hunger and violence.

One should not forget that many of the great masterworks of art are created at the time when famine and plague tortured mankind (e.g. the frescos of Michelangelo and the cantatas of Bach). This does not mean that outer hardships per se benefit artistic work, but that even the hardest times can not extinguish the human ability and urge to perceive and produce beauty. As a matter of fact, art is one of the most significant, creative and useful ways to cope with the darkest sides of human existence.

 To see the beauty of life does not mean that our life should have a happy ending. As far as we know, human life is always a tragedy. We all die in the end. Beauty is something that mortal beings are aware of. We may suppose or believe that there are immortal beings (God, angels) who can appreciate beauty, even better than we. However, our idea of beauty is not of a supernatural origin, even if we believe that God is the source of all beauty. We do not know how does an immortal or all-knowing Being apprehend beauty, but about how humans experience beauty we have ample evidence and personal knowledge. For us, there is no other beauty than the transient and mortal one. Faith means here the necessary perspective for us to see this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ubiquity of the Body of Christ - A Lutheran Way to See God Everywhere

-
Image
After Luther’s death in 1546, the real presence of the body of Christ in the Lord’s Supper became the shibboleth of orthodoxy in Lutheranism. It was thought that one could thereby distinguish between Philippists or Crypto-Calvinists and genuine Lutherans. A major proponent of the Lutheran position was the Reformer of Württemberg, Johannes Brenz (1499-1570). The writings that gave Brenz a place in the history of theology are De personali unione (1561) and De maiestate Domini (1562). In these treatises he continues and deepens the argumentation of the real presence advocated in the Stuttgart Confession (1559). His opponents were Swiss reformers Peter Martyr Vermigli and Heinrich Bullinger, who commented his writings. Vermigli died while writing a reply for De personali unione . At his deathbed, his friend Bullinger comforted him with the word of God: “But our citizenship is in heaven” (Phil. 3,20) and Vermigli replied: “But not in Brenz’ heaven, that is nowhere.” The Christologi
Read more

Improvisation as a theological method. Towards a free and imaginative reading of the Bible. Part 1

-
Image
Religious traditions tend to become systems of oppression and attendants of violence. Subjugation of women in religious societies, as well as the difficult position of sexual and gender minorities among churches serve as examples of the violent undercurrents of sacred hierarchies. To say the least, religious convictions are prone to be conservative, unyielding and unimaginative. This should not necessarily be the case. As a matter of fact, religion can be a source of endless creativity and irresistible hope that cherishes all life in its variety. I suppose this applies to all major religions. In this article I however concentrate on the Western Christianity, the religious tradition I am most familiar with. The history of the Western Christendom is full of power conflicts, prejudice and inflexibility, resulting in condemnations and sheer bloodshed. On the other hand, the very same tradition includes innovations, reforms, religious creativity, tolerance,beauty and love of neighbor. My pe
Read more

Hamann's "Aesthetica in nuce"

-
Image
 I feel frightened to enter into discussion on Johann Georg Hamann (1730-88). He is an intriguing figure of the German enlightment and 18th century literature, whom many contemporaries (presumably those who were positively disposed towards him) regarded as an obscure thinker. The less positively disposed thought he has completely lost it. Those who need a magisterial introduction to his theological thinking should consult Oswald Bayer's superb "A Contemporary in dissent" (Eerdmans 2012). I admit that I lack the thoroughness and perspicuity of Bayer's study. Nevertheless, the very boldness of Hamann's writings, his disregard of rules of grammar and philosophy, his appetite for the lowly and contradictory, urge me to read and comment his famous essay "Aesthetica in nuce" (aesthetics in a nutshell). Hamann's texts are a jungle of diverse styles and literary genres where  "exuberant demonstrations of learning" (to employ words of Kenneth Haynes
Read more