St Augustine's pear theft

-

 In the second book of his Confessions, St Augustine recounts a boyhood incident: he and his fellows did steal some pears from the neighbourhood. A modern reader probably sneers at the moral pangs Augustine describes in the following chapters. Really, how does one feel guilty on such an occasion? He and other lads wanted to taste some pears from some other's garden. Augustine admits that he was not deeply fond of the pears themselves but rather liked the idea of doing something forbidden: "I joyed in the theft and sin itself." Clearly, it was a heedless act: some teenagers took fruits and threw them away, after hardly tasting them. It happens. Does it yet qualify for an object of serious remorse? Some regard this episode as a proof of the absurdity of Christian ethics, concerned on the minute naughty thoughts. There are true problems in the world, real viciousness takes place, other than folly of the adolescent. 

On the other hand, St Augustine's thoughts on human behaviour initiated by the memory of this seemingly harmless prank are not insignificant. He arrives at deep ponderings on what motivates our actions. Everything we do, we do for something good. A murderer kills another man because he loves the latter's wife or property. There is nothing ludicrous in these thoughts but their occasion: a pear theft by youngsters.

The aesthetic dimension involved in Augustine's memoirs is that the moments of our daily life bear a greater significance. The beauty and greatness of our lives does not manifest itself through conspicuous and heroic spectacles, but in the various minor choices we make every day and which we esteem to be of no account. Hence the greatness of a bagatelle. Kierkegaard once stated that there are two reasons why people fail to do the right thing. The first is to think that I am such an unimportant person that my choices do not matter. The second is to think that I am such a great personage that I can afford a minor mistake. Ultimately, there is no one to do the right thing than myself, here and now.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Eros and Agape Revisited.

-
Image
 The Swedish theologian Anders Nygren wrote some 90 years ago his groundbreaking study Den kristna kärlekstanken genom tiderna (Engl. "Eros and Agape"). The basic idea of Nygren is simple: There are two main forms - or motives - of love. The first is eros, that means human desire for fulfillment. Love as eros is aimed at the person/thing that I am wanting, that satisfies my longing and fills the empty space in my heart. The second form of love is agape, that does not seek for its own, but is generously giving itself to the other. This, precisely, is the Christian love promoted by St Paul in 1 Corinthians 13. The cross of Christ unfolded the meaning of agape: self-surrender until death. "In this is love, not that we loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the expiation for our sins." (1 Jn 4,10) In Nygren's view, eros appears as the selfish kind of love, whereas agape has a more divine and disinterested aura. Nygren, the Lutheran bishop, finds the...
Read more

The Ubiquity of the Body of Christ - A Lutheran Way to See God Everywhere

-
Image
After Luther’s death in 1546, the real presence of the body of Christ in the Lord’s Supper became the shibboleth of orthodoxy in Lutheranism. It was thought that one could thereby distinguish between Philippists or Crypto-Calvinists and genuine Lutherans. A major proponent of the Lutheran position was the Reformer of Württemberg, Johannes Brenz (1499-1570). The writings that gave Brenz a place in the history of theology are De personali unione (1561) and De maiestate Domini (1562). In these treatises he continues and deepens the argumentation of the real presence advocated in the Stuttgart Confession (1559). His opponents were Swiss reformers Peter Martyr Vermigli and Heinrich Bullinger, who commented his writings. Vermigli died while writing a reply for De personali unione . At his deathbed, his friend Bullinger comforted him with the word of God: “But our citizenship is in heaven” (Phil. 3,20) and Vermigli replied: “But not in Brenz’ heaven, that is nowhere.” The Christologi...
Read more

Théologie des seins

-
Image
  Que tu es belle, mon amie, que tu es belle! Tes yeux sont des colombes, derrière ton voile. Tes cheveux sont comme un troupeau de chèvres, suspendues aux flancs de la montagne de Galaad. Tes dents sont comme un troupeau de brebis tondues, qui remontent de l'abreuvoir; Toutes portent des jumeaux, aucune d'elles n'est stérile. Tes lèvres sont comme un fil cramoisi, et ta bouche est charmante; Ta joue est comme une moitié de grenade, derrière ton voile. Ton cou est comme la tour de David, bâtie pour être un arsenal; Mille boucliers y sont suspendus, tous les boucliers des héros. Tes deux seins sont comme deux faons, comme les jumeaux d'une gazelle, qui paissent au milieu des lis.(Cant.4:1-5)  La langage érotique du Cantique des cantiques a toujours bouleversé la pensée théologique - des hommes, on peut supposer. Un des grands commentateurs chrétiens, Grégoire le Grand (6eme siècle), pour sa part, explique l'usage biblique des membres feminins avec une mise en garde:...
Read more